Monday, October 8, 2012

This American School


  Is there anything better than a quiet Sunday afternoon listening to Ira Glass and This American Life?  Not that I ever get to indulge this pleasure, but I know it must be a wonderful thing to do.  Not long ago they featured an hour-long segment I managed to listen to twice while grading papers at school.  Honestly, this piece is worth listening to many times.  Listen to it in parts and consider its implications for schools, testing, No Child Left Behind, and our entire conception of education and schooling.  Listen here… http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/474/back-to-school

Essentially, this is a long discussion about what really matters in one’s education.  We are in the midst of a trend in American education that stresses test scores as a measure of cognitive skills.  We are valueing book smarts above all else.  But I will bet that when you stop and think about it we can all find examples of many students, colleagues and friends with excellent  measured cognitive skills who lacked the sense to come in from the rain.  And we know others who struggled with book skills in a traditional school setting who became entrepreneurs, teachers, business leaders and so on. 
  
A growing body of research is pointing to non-cognitive skills as the key to success.  These skills or traits include tenacity, resilience, and impulse control.  As educators we must consider how we teach these skills and to what degree we simply expect kids to have these from their homes or by virtue of their personalities.  Can any of us honestly say that someone’s IQ or SAT score had a great impact or served as a greater predictor of their eventual success than personality traits.  Where do tenacity, resilience, and impulse control come from? How and from whom do we learn these skills or traits?  Can we teach them in the classroom?  In this era of accountability, business models and an insistence on measurable results, can we measure tenacity, resilience, and impulse control?  

If the research indicates that these traits are most important predictors of success we must figure out how to teach them.  We must figure out how to measure them.  We must put the focus back on what really matters. 

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Dress Codes


Just as school began USA Today ran an article (http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/story/2012-07-17/teacher-dress-code/56579488/1 ) about teachers and dress codes.  I have such conflicting thoughts.  As a parent I love uniforms for kids, though I confess to finding rules about sock colors or what can be on a jacket a bit silly.  Kids in uniforms take away so many issues with expense, status, and self-image and puts the focus on education.  But for teachers?…. For my first three years of teaching I wore a tie every day and never jeans.  In my fourth year I wore a tie 80% of the time.  I think I had taught for six years before I wore jeans.  But by my 11th or 12th year….all jeans and never ties.  I dressed neat, but never dressed up.  I rationalized this by explaining that I had earned my credibility.  I was known, my hair had begun to gray and my students and their families frequently knew me before they started class. I honestly do not think my teaching was remotely impacted by not dressing up.  And I was comfortable and happy; I was ready to mix it up with the kids no matter what they brought.  Now?  After 20 years in the classroom, I dress better than I have since those first five years - a change of attitude and atmosphere.

On the other hand, I have had many colleagues who explain that they firmly believe that dressing well changes one’s attitude and one’s reception.  I cannot disagree.  If teachers want to be received as professionals they need to dress the part.  Will it improve student achievement?  I can’t say.  Will well-dressed teachers have some positive effect on the classroom and the building?  I have to believe they would.    

What should the elements of a teachers’ dress code be?  How do we define what is appropriate?  Can tattoos show?  Does it depend on content area?  Do we define width of straps and lengths of skirts?  Do we get into shoes?  Jewelry?  Are there safety issues to consider?  Do we ban or accept political buttons?  Religious symbols?  

Anyone who has ever tried to write, interpret or enforce a student dress code knows it is wrought with danger.  How complex does it get with teachers?  Consider also that on one staff you might have teachers as young as 22 and as old as…well, let’s just say experienced.  

While I can agree that having some professional expectations for attire is entirely reasonable and with merit, getting it done might be quite difficult.  

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Gotta Laugh

I think we need to take a careful look at all that we do in our schools…from the buildings to our food, pedagogy to grading policies.  Just as important is listening to our students.  Granted, they are not always helpful…but sometimes they offer some real gems.  Give them some modern technology and the sky is the limit.  These kids are teaching us a lesson in free speech, activism, nutrition, self-advocacy and social media.  Enjoy this….

Monday, September 24, 2012

How did a year go by without a post?  While the 2011-2012 school was great on so many levels, it was wildly hectic and stressful.  But what a gift summer and a new school year can be!  And this school year has started us off with so much to discuss.  Thank you, Chicago, a few new movies and a political campaign for stirring the journalists’ pens.  And thank you to the gift of time as I finally feel like I am settling into my current school setting.  You can now look forward to at least a post per week.  So let’s talk.

National Public radio has had in recent weeks a number of great stories about education, teaching and learning.  On September 17 they featured an item, “Teachers’ Expectations Can Influence How Students Perform” (listen to or read it here – but hearing it will be more instructive - http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/09/18/161159263/teachers-expectations-can-influence-how-students-perform). 

My first reaction to the title was a bit ho-hum.  Don’t all classroom teachers know this already?  On the other hand, I have been doing this long enough that I know better than to blow this off.  Many, many teachers know that their expectations have an impact, but they are unconscious of their underlying beliefs.  Furthermore, changing those beliefs is extremely difficult.  Finally, even if progress is made on our expectations and beliefs, it is in our actions that we make the difference.  How do we change our behaviors?

Here are my take-aways from the article.  First, we behave differently when we expect more from our students.  We are more patient, quicker with positive feedback, and quicker with a smile.  Can we send a different message by being aware of smiling at all our students, offering plentiful, positive feedback to all, and being more patient with all students?  Of course, but how will we know we are doing it.  As the article says, it is very hard to police our own actions.  Take away two – video tape ourselves and look at the recording with a coach or master teacher.  This might sound terrifying, but there is ample research to indicate that this is wonderfully effective.  I have known many young, fearless teachers who made great strides using video of themselves.  My final take-way comes from the audio more than the print version.  Listen to the possible reactions of a teacher speaking  to a lively young boy.  The suggested changes are simple, indicative of ones beliefs and huge for the atmosphere in the classroom.  The possible impact on the willingness to learn for the boy involved?  Immeasurable. 

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Welcome Back

Another school year is here and I have a lot to share.  Now if I can just find the time.  Over the summer the New York Times had numerous items in Room for Debate.  Check them out here. http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/topics/education

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Homework

How important is homework?  Just as a few years of teaching led me to begin questioning grading practices, they also led me to question virtually everything about homework.  Why do teachers assign it and what purpose does it serve?  At various points in my career I have assigned homework so that content could be covered faster.  At other times it was so that students practiced a skill they had learned in class.  Maybe it was to wrap up something we didn’t finish in class.  Sometimes it was simply some reading to introduce students to some content so that we could have richer dialogue the next day.  But if we are trying to teach ALL students, is it realistic, is it even fair to have all kids read content so that we can cover more in less time?  Won’t that just keep the kids already behind, farther behind still?  If homework is to practice a skill, is it doing any good if the student hasn’t already mastered the skill?  Practicing a skill wrong only leads to more mistakes.  If the homework is to expose students to some new content and they are not highly skilled readers, what have we accomplished? 
As a high school teacher, homework is just part of the landscape; it often goes unquestioned.  It needs to be.  I don’t suggest that we need to do away with homework in high school, but we ought to ask the questions that force us to make its use more educationally sound.  Is homework serving our students’ best interests?  Could we alter the homework so that it does meet ALL students’ needs?

But we must also consider when homework should be assigned.  First grade?  Seventh grade?  And how much is enough?  What is gained and what is sacrificed by asking an eight year old to spend 30 minutes doing math problems they may or may not understand and writing vocabulary words?  Does it get in the way or does it enhance family life?  Are they learning from it or just slogging through?  Is homework one of the things that end up making kids lose their enthusiasm for school? 

Consider these questions as you give this a read…. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/16/education/16homework.html

Monday, June 6, 2011

Grades

About ten years ago I started doing some serious thinking about the grades I was reporting for my students.  Early in my career my grade book was filled with assignments and few of them required great thought; too often they were busy-work.  The real evaluations, assessments and tests made up a small portion of the overall grade.  I reasoned that this allowed kids with a good work ethic but troubles retaining content to still earn a good grade.  The real world rewarded hard workers, after all.  Lots of smart people struggle to hold a job, but those willing to work.  It was however a nightmare for me.  Between grading with any integrity, tracking missing assignments and calculating grades I was exhausted.  I got to wondering….what does a grade mean?  Who looks at it and what do they think it means?  That just kicked off a firestorm of further questions and eventually conversations and possible solutions.

Please indulge me while I rattle off most of these questions.  Consider your answers too:

What do grades in elementary school mean and what message to they send our kids?  When is the right time to transition to the traditional A-F?  Should we even have those?  What do they mean?  According to most school handbooks A is exemplary, B is above average and C is average.  But what does this mean…is the “average” the average kid that age, the average kid in that school or community, the average kid in the class?  Is it measured against some absolute or against the peers, thereby making the grade a de facto competition?  Do these grades represent academic performance, reaching an achievement measure, effort, integrity, mastery of content knowledge and/or skill?  Why does the range for A-D typically cover 10% increments while the F covers from a 0% to a 59.4%?  Is it acceptable to be correct only 61% of the time or know only 61% of the skills and still receive credit for a course?  Should reported grades include evaluations early in a term while students are adjusting to new content, new expectations, a new term and teacher?  Should it be their performance at the end that matters?  If the grade represents skills and content acquired, standards met, should practice and homework assignments be counted in the picture?  Should students lose points for turning in late work or coming to class late if the grade supposedly represents mastery of content and skills?  Should extra credit exist if the grade supposedly represents mastery of content and skills?  If so, what should that extra credit be awarded for – bringing tissues, box tops, attending school events, writing extra essays?  Can a student’s performance really be discerned from a letter?  Is a C in an AP class different than a C in an Honors or regular course? (And for another time, don’t such designations create de facto tracking?)  Is a C in English 10 the same in each school, each district, state?  Who looks at and interprets these grades and do they define the grades the same way the people who assigned the grades do?  Are we all looking at the same apples?  How long do the grades matter?  Can we discern anything about a person at 30 years old based on their high school or even college transcript?

After asking these questions of my own practices I came to the conclusion that the grades were relatively meaningless.  The horror!  If I wasn’t sure what I was trying to say via a grade how could they mean anything?  I had the opportunity to see Ken O’Connor (http://www.oconnorgrading.com/)  at a staff development session, and he really got me thinking.  Ever since, my grades have been streamlined and strictly about academic performance – no busy work, no points off for being late – all tests, essays, presentations – real opportunities for student to show what they know and what they can do.  Not yet perfect by any means, but I can rest much easier when I look at grades.  Mind you, to some degree they are still contrived and I am still not sure what they really mean.  But I am working on it. 

But education is far more than just mastering content and skills, right?  That’s just schooling – and Twain asked not to let it get in the way of our education.  The real world, whatever that is, asks for adults to be hard-working, responsible, thoughtful citizens.  Schools are partially responsible.  When schools and teachers insist that work be turned in on time or that students do not plagiarize, they are following through on that commitment.  But should a students’ integrity, for lack of a better word, get wrapped into a grade that supposedly measures their academic performance? 

I like O’Connor’s suggestion…give two grades.  Make one strictly about academic performance and the other about integrity.  On the academic side cut all the busy-work and practice work grades and evaluate on the finished product only?  Consider it this way… a basketball team has practice all week.  They do drills. They break the game down into small segments.  They shoot foul shots.  They dribble.  Then on Friday they have a game.  Fans, family and the media all show up.  None of them care what happened all week in practice.  All that matters is the performance at game time.  Our students need practice and drills.  They need the “game” broken down into parts.  And they may even need a few games to hit their stride.  Then they might blossom at the end into champions we never saw coming at the beginning – and they should still get invited to the Big Dance based on their strong finish.

Let’s have some serious dialogue about completely rethinking how we grade.  Let’s do this for our students.       

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Summer time and time to evaluate

Writing a blog about education is an interesting endeavor.  The job of teaching swallows us whole and robs us of the time it takes to write reflectively.  Then summer comes, and we just want to escape school completely.  Yet, it is with some distance, some perspective that we can most clearly critique what we do.  Summer is the ideal time for all educators to stop and think, reflect and question.  So while I am scoring AP exams with 1000 colleagues and discussing the challenges of the job think about this.... http://www.theamericanscholar.org/the-seduction/ and ask yourself, why do we teach the way we do?  Who are we serving?  Could we change how we do things and serve a broader audience?  Could we reach more students?  Could we have more meaningful classes for a wider range of students?  But do your best to think about these things while sitting on a beach somewhere.  You earned it! 

Thursday, May 12, 2011

There's Hope

It is possible to make a difference.  It is possible to reach those you might think are most hopeless.  It is possible to reach those least prepared.  And often, just because a kid is from a certain family, neighborhood, or background does not mean they fit any stereotype.  Listen and learn... and teach... http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/05/12/memphis-school-obama

Friday, April 29, 2011

Perfect for Testing Season

I imagine every teacher out there can identify with this.  Read it, feel the frustration, but rest easy in doing what is right and necessary for the good our students...
http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2011/04/04/lettertesting.html?tkn=LRCFDkyfRbivxU5YEvG2%2BRitbitUoYsHRMVS&cmp=clp-sb-teacher

And now from Finland

We need to be willing to think outside the box when it comes to improving and changing education in America.   But I understand that it can be scary to try new things.  Furthermore, there may be more slowly changing institution that formal education. To change will take both courage and patience.  While we are figuring out what to do and how to do it it would behoove us look to places where change has begun.  Let’s look to Finland.  I read years ago that in Finland they had a unique response to low-performing schools – they increased funding to them.  Think about it… low performance leads to more funding to find and enact solutions.  Though I forget the details, I suspect the continuation of such increased funding was tied to increased performance.  That appears to be the opposite of the American model – under-perform and loose funding but still be required to lift achievement. 
Now I come across more from Finland.  I currently teach in an elite, high-stress, amazingly high performing, private school that asks for long hours, lots of homework, strict behavioral guidelines and great structure.  I teach in a school that could make many a Tiger Mom very happy.  Many people seem to think such structure and time on task is the answer to problems in our schools.  But consider this from Finland – fewer hours, less structure and greater freedom leads to top performance…

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Online Education

While I am sure there is a place for online education, it will never hold a candle to face-to-face instruction, guidance and mentoring.  The learning and teaching process is fundamentally about communication and relationships between learners.  Certainly, there are situations where it saves significant resources.  Small, rural schools simply can't hire staffs of teachers to offer 23 AP courses or six foreign languages because they have a half dozen kids to take advantage of them.  There are places where online education provides an answer to a challenging problem.  But too often I hear people talk about online education as some sort of panacea or a viable replacement for classroom education.  These are often the same people who were convinced that VCRs, overhead projectors, ceiling-mounted digital projectors, laptops, powerpoint, hyperstudio, etc. were tranforming tools.  They miss the fact that a good teacher knows his or her students as people, tailors instruction accordingly, forms bonds with his or her students and makes sure that the relationship between learners is a regular and vital part of the classroom experience.  Technology is simply a tool.  Granted, if the point of school is the aquisition of points, grades and test scores I'm completely wrong.  But I don't think that's really the reason we have school.  For more on the subject check out today's NY Times' Room for Debate at    
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/04/05/can-young-students-learn-from-online-classes

Monday, March 28, 2011

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Raise Teachers' Status

The New York Times 


March 16, 2011

U.S. Is Urged to Raise Teachers’ Status

To improve its public schools, the United States should raise the status of the teaching profession by recruiting more qualified candidates, training them better and paying them more, according to a new report on comparative educational systems.
Andreas Schleicher, who oversees the international achievement test known by its acronym Pisa, says in his report that top-scoring countries like Korea, Singapore and Finland recruit only high-performing college graduates for teaching positions, support them with mentoring and other help in the classroom, and take steps to raise respect for the profession.
“Teaching in the U.S. is unfortunately no longer a high-status occupation,” Mr. Schleicher says in the report, prepared in advance of an educational conference that opens in New York on Wednesday. “Despite the characterization of some that teaching is an easy job, with short hours and summers off, the fact is that successful, dedicated teachers in the U.S. work long hours for little pay and, in many cases, insufficient support from their leadership.”
The conference, convened by the federal Department of Education, was expected to bring together education ministers and leaders of teachers’ unions from 16 countries as well as state superintendents from nine American states. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said that he hoped educational leaders would use the conference to share strategies for raising student achievement.
“We’re all facing similar challenges,” Mr. Duncan said in an interview.
The meeting occurs at a time when teachers’ rights, roles and responsibilities are being widely debated in the United States.
Republicans in Wisconsin and several other states have been pushing legislation to limit teachers’ collective bargaining rights and reduce taxpayer contributions to their pensions.
President Obama has been trying to promote a different view.
“In South Korea, teachers are known as ‘nation builders,’ and I think it’s time we treated our teachers with the same level of respect,” Mr. Obama said in a speech on education on Monday.
Mr. Schleicher is a senior official at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or O.E.C.D., a Paris group that includes the world’s major industrial powers. He wrote the new report, “What the U.S. Can Learn from the World’s Most Successful Education Reform Efforts,” with Steven L. Paine, a CTB/McGraw-Hill vice president who is a former West Virginia schools superintendent, for the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation.
It draws on data from the Program for International Student Assessment, which periodically tests 15-year-old students in more than 50 countries in math, reading or science.
On the most recent Pisa, the top-scoring countries were Finland and Singapore in science, Korea and Finland in reading and Singapore and Korea in math. On average, American teenagers came in 15th in reading and 19th in science. American students placed 27th in math. Only 2 percent of American students scored at the highest proficiency level, compared with 8 percent in Korea and 5 percent in Finland.
The “five things U.S. education reformers could learn” from the high-performing countries, the report says, include adopting common academic standards — an effort well under way here, led by state governors — developing better tests for use by teachers in diagnosing students’ day-to-day learning needs and training more effective school leaders.
“Make a concerted effort to raise the status of the teaching profession” was the top recommendation.
University teaching programs in the high-scoring countries admit only the best students, and “teaching education programs in the U.S. must become more selective and more rigorous,” the report says.
Raising teachers’ status is not mainly about raising salaries, the report says, but pay is a factor.
According to O.E.C.D. data, the average salary of a veteran elementary teacher here was $44,172 in 2008, higher than the average of $39,426 across all O.E.C.D countries (the figures were converted to compare the purchasing power of each currency).
But that salary level was 40 percent below the average salary of other American college graduates. In Finland, by comparison, the veteran teacher’s salary was 13 percent less than that of the average college graduate’s.
In an interview, Mr. Schleicher said the point was not that the United States spends too little on public education — only Luxembourg among the O.E.C.D. countries spends more per elementary student — but rather that American schools spend disproportionately on other areas, like bus transportation and sports facilities.
“You can spend a lot of money on education, but if you don’t spend it wisely, on improving the quality of instruction, you won’t get higher student outcomes,” Mr. Schleicher said.
.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Make It Personal

I have been saying for years that learning is maximized when the content touches students personally.  I acknowledge that this can be difficult in some subjects.  But therein lies the art of the teacher.  Furthermore, in my work on the achievement gap I regulalry point out that what we need to find are the strategies that lift achievement for all while accelerating the achievement of those measured below average.  Strategies that simply lift all perpetuate the same gap we have.  So how do we accelerate some, but lift all?  That is the key to closing gaps.  The National Science Foundation released this finding this week....  http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=118878&WT.mc_id=USNSF_1

This isn't a new finding for those who have been searching for such solutions, but it is stated in a succinct fashion.  Bottom line...teachers, ask your students to write about themselves, their life, their values.  Get to know them and let them share themselves.  Make them a vital part of instruction.  

Memphis Schools Merge

I had briefly followed the story of a merger between two school districts in the Memphis area.  I stopped when I cynically realized there was no way the voting public would go for such a plan.  Fortunately, I was proven wrong.  Here is, in my opinion, a real sign of both progress and hope for our schools and our nation.  While not a perfect plan, it shows willingess to work together across all sorts of historical lines of division.  Well done... http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/District_Dossier/2011/03/memphis_residents_vote_to_merg.html  

Speak Up

The White House, Washington

Good morning,
The state of the American education system today is unacceptable. As many as one quarter of American students don’t finish high school. We've fallen to ninth place in the proportion of young people with college degrees. The quality of our math and science education lags behind many other nations.
For the sake of the next generation, and America's economic future, this has to change.
Providing our nation's students with a world-class education is a shared responsibility. We can't out-compete the rest of the world in the 21st century global economy unless we out-educate them. It's going to take all of us -- educators, parents, students, philanthropists, state and local leaders, and the federal government -- working together to prepare today’s students for the jobs of the 21st century.
That's why I want to hear from you. As President Obama's chief advisor on domestic policy, I focus much of my time on education reform. As part of the White House’s new Advise the Advisor program, I've posed a few key questions for parents, teachers and students to answer so we can get a sense of what’s working in your communities -- and what needs to change.
Take a minute to let me know what you think:
The good news is that we're making progress and seeing improvements around the country already, focusing on our own Three R's: responsibility, reform and results.
Take Miami Central High School, where the President and I traveled on Friday. Several years ago, Miami Central was struggling. Achievement was lagging at the school, and morale was down. Graduation rates hovered at just 36 percent.  But the Miami Central community came together. They set high expectations, and they did the hard work to reform their school. They've turned around their performance -- academic achievement is improving, and graduation rates have improved by nearly 30 points. Miami Central is now well on its way toward providing college and career readiness for its students.
Today, we're visiting TechBoston Academy, a great example of private-sector, non-profit and higher-education partners working with communities to help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they'll need to succeed in college and careers. At TechBoston Academy sixth grade through twelfth grade students learn by using technology in their classrooms. Thanks to strong partners, TechBoston students have access to a 21st century curriculum, early enrollment in college classes, and an extended day program to provide enrichment and to deepen learning in core subjects.
These schools in Miami and Boston are just two examples of success. I'm looking for feedback from more all-star schools, as well as your strategies and challenges to reform our education system. 
As I mentioned earlier, education reform is a shared responsibility for all of us, and it's one that we at the White House take very seriously.
Sincerely,
Melody Barnes
Director of the Domestic Policy Council
P.S. If you're passionate about education issues we've set up a special email list focused on education  that will offer more frequent updates on the topic moving forward: